Op-Ed: The unions three years after Janus | national

“Take this job and do it. I don’t work here anymore. You better not stand in my way, as I walk out the door. Take this job and do it! I don’t work here anymore.” – Johnny Paycheck

For years, cities, counties, and states spent millions of dollars paying the full-time salaries and benefits of employees who were forced to belong to unions. Collective agreements with unions across America have been funded by well-paid lobbyists and union bosses. Their mission was to secure capricious salaries and benefits for civil servants over the private sector.

Since the early 1900s, public sector labor leaders have united with federal, state and local Democratic politicians to adopt policies that require public servants to pay ransom in order to keep their jobs. To appease members who get more to do less, union bosses used their dues money to fund the election of Democrats who would reward them with free benefits.

Almost three years to the day, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Mark Janus in the landmark Janus v. AFSCME. They considered it unconstitutional to force public sector workers to pay a union money to keep their jobs. The case was filed by Mark Janus, who was reluctant to pay dues for collective bargaining and other work the union did on behalf of their employees in the workplace.

While the unions took a heavy blow from the Supreme Court in the Janus case, the ruling did not affect the obligations of the private sector. The court ruled that the private sector model cannot be applied to “public sector unions”, since collective bargaining in the public service is approved by government officials.

“There is no need in the public sector to have collective bargaining because the government is the people and the people cannot negotiate with themselves.” – Franklin roosevelt

The Janus decision was also a victory for taxpayers as they pay the salaries and benefits of public service employees. Many Americans believed it was unfair for members of public service unions to contribute to a system they funded. These unions were not only concerned with labor issues, they were engaged in political activities. Janus also gave employees the freedom of political choice.

Public unions in all federated states have been affected by Janus. It was planned that Janus would destroy the public sector unions because they would lose income. It would also limit their political power. Why would workers who could receive the same benefits as members without paying dues join a union?

But America has underestimated the political power of public service unions. They had an arsenal of state and federal politicians in their hip pockets by the time SCOTUS ruled on Janus.

“When buying and selling is controlled by law, the first things to buy are lawmakers.” – PJ O’Rourke

Many liberal states with strong unions had already taken legal steps to protect public sector unions from the impact of a positive Janus decision. The unions were aware that they would lose dues and membership money, and were working with liberal politicians to reduce their losses. Therefore, the Janus decision did not negatively affect unions or their Democratic Party allies as predicted by labor experts.

Weeks after the Janus ruling, the Blue States passed legislation to protect unions from the impact of Janus. Liberal states like New York, where 70% of public servants are unionized, were the first to respond. The deposed governor Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order protecting the work records of public union employees to prevent them from being informed of their newly acquired rights. Cuomo said, “This order is intended to protect workers from harassment and intimidation by enemies of unions.” His order also required new recruits to meet with union representatives so that they could be intimidated into joining the union.

Democrats in the Blue State have gone on a rampage to protect their political income. California, Maryland and Washington have given unions access to employee records. California also introduced new recruits to the unions.

“The only effective response to organized greed is organized labor.” –Thomas Donahue

California, Washington and New Jersey prohibited employers from discouraging membership. In New Jersey, public employers who violate this provision would have to reimburse unions for lost dues. These laws were designed to prevent workers from knowing their rights after Janus.

Although the civil service unions found ways around Janus, Janus had some unforeseen advantages. The difference between public and private unions is crucial. Private unions are governed by the text of the National Industrial Relations Act (NLRA) and by decisions of federal courts. But no matter how much these unions pay liberal politicians, taxpayers only indirectly foot the bill.

Since the Janus case was tried in the court of public opinion, it has brought to light the intrusive power of unions. And that did not please many Americans who blamed the unions for the higher prices of tangible goods and services. They expressed their anger at state legislatures that have started to pass right to work laws.

“The right to work simply means ‘the right to work’ and nothing more.” – Scott Walker

The American labor movement has been in crisis for years and has continued to pin its hopes for survival on state and federal Democrats. But no matter what liberal lawmakers do for unions, their slide will be impossible to reverse as union interests conflict with those of members.

Unions are out of touch with today’s free-for-all attitude. The days of Hoffa brotherhood are gone forever. Former AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka tried to strictly enforce fair labor standards and national labor relations laws to force more people to unionize, but it backfired him. Workers favor individual wages over collectivism. They want the best deal for themselves, not for a union.

John Wooden told us, “It’s good to be a team player. But personal effort makes you a winner. Only 10.3% of the American workforce is unionized today. Data from the Department of Labor shows that this is half of what it was in 1983 and a third of what it was in 1950. With many states passing laws on the right to work and employers and workers. benefiting employees, the “one size fits all” union model in the workplace is obsolete. Workers care less about brotherhood than about their own wages.

The irony of Janus is that he had little effect on the public unions since the Blue States were able to neutralize him. Although Janus does not apply to private unions, he is raising awareness of the political power of unions and voters are responding. Today all of the south has the right to work and a total of 30 states now have right to work laws.

Joseph McCartin of Georgetown wrote that when unions became dependent solely on Democrats to prioritize their needs, it was difficult to sell their policies to the public. It ruined their image with the average American voter. Work and politics do not mix and it will be the Waterloo of the union.

“We have to campaign with employers to get what we want for our union brothers. There are no shortcuts to getting our demands across in the workplace. And this is how we will get there! – James P. Hoffa

the shortcuts to be obtained are requirements in the workplace. And that’s how it’s going to do it! “–James P. Hoffa

Source link